As Jews have their conjuring tricks well lined up in law, politics and the media, so when resisting anything in those areas the Jewish Noahide Laws kick in to play. These laws are part of what is carried in their scrolls and tell them what they can do, or not do, to the ones that Noahide needs to be enforced on. This deeming of theirs is never question in law, politics or the media, and that's because they run those three things. Oh what a world to be able to deem this and to deem that on anyone and everyone you deem deemable. The resulting deeming carries over the Shetar into the Christian world, and also the Pagan world, the Agnostic or even the Aetheistic world, which are all deemed to be within the parameters of the Christian world.
So, to give some context to the chutzpah being utilised for the enforcement of deemed contracts and deemed Nahide Laws affecting every non-Jews life we need to first substantiate a few things about a few things. Firstly, we are ALL free to contract as we will. As with the Mormon deeming of any one who has died can be baptised into their Church for bumping their numbers up and laying claims to any abandoned estates. They were told off for this malpractice and now they follow a rule of if a family member joins, then all of their ancestors can be baptised into their Church at the deeming of the family member joined into the Church. Can anyone see where this could go as the patrol the streets with their recruitment drives? Remember Mormons use the concept of Jews versus Gentiles, not and Gentiles. They also relieve any and all Jews of any judgements to be made on them "until the final day", blah, blah.
So, there's a verifiable link to Jews and deeming outside of Jewry, if you think it's not verifiable, then go ask a Mormon. I'm sure by now followers of this blog are well versed in the contents of this 1 min. video here: LINK. And that Jewish chutzpah nose no ends when it comes to creating one rule for them and any rule they deem for others, as described in this video here:. LINK. So what of the subject matter of the title of this article in relation to OFGEM the (J)UK regulatory body for gas and electric. Well, when the National Industries of gas and electric were sold of then, as you can imagine, the masses leaped into action to read all the dotted i's and crossed t's of the contract(s) the (J)UK were selling for private corporations. Now, I know, and know why, the government are wholly unrepresentative of the people in every which way, because from it's root as deemed overlord everything they do is crooked.
Let me explain. If I was working for you then sold the contract I have with you on to others would you consider yourself legal obliged to enter into that contract without any actual inspection of that contract that you have now been deemed to be in? You may say, yes, of course I'm then obligated into that contract, as long as it's the same. Well, what if it's not the same? What if the oh so innocent government pulled a fast one on not only the selling of the contracts, which they just did and never asked anyone involved on behalf of who they were selling it for by their own volition. This of course leads to the Trust Law tenet that one who benefits from a thing is then bound to pay for the thing until it is their outright. Formerly called an Use in English Civil Law, a Usufruct in English Common Law and a Trust in Equity, the Ecclesiastical side of life.
Now, since the Judicature Acts of the late 1800's, the separate jurisdictions were amalgamated due to the fact that too many Common Law judges were being sued for fraud in Chancery(The old Ecclesiastical jurisdiction for Church)/Civil Law, because Equity, cases held in Chancery, will not allow a statute to cloak a fraud. Since that time, the Maxim of Equity "Equity will not allow a statute to cloak a fraud" has been rendered redundant by the "Devil's Own". LINK. Unfortunately for the Devil's Own they have come late to the party, and as much as they've loved their anarchism it's now high time to pull the plug on their little kosher parade of shekels for misery. That longstanding relationship of Jews, Shabbos Goyim and the hoodwinking, skull cracking bullying tactics as so well utilised in Shanghaing normal pleasant folk and turning them into criminals.
"We all know that words and concepts are slippery things, and especially so if we are lawyers. A phrase, an idea, even a fact, can have a very different meaning or significance to different people, even a very different meaning or significance to the same person in different contexts. When Lewis Carroll’s Humpty Dumpty famously said “'When I use a word … it means just what I choose it to mean” :- Magna Carta and the Holy Grail Lord Neuberger Lincoln’s Inn, 12 May 2015 LINK.
For all of Lord Neuberger's Jewish musings, the word of a man, a White man, is his bond. This has been the case for gallant men to aspire to and maintain. When our societies have been corrupted by the Jewish minds, Sigmund Freud, Albert Einstein, Julius Oppenheimer, Richard Bandler and oh so many others in the constant barrage they do love so much. If I say I wish to not contract with anyone it is indeed my Constitutional Right to choose to that. It is also an obligatory duty to enforce that Constitutional Right as a point of law. For deemed things to materialise it takes acceptance, and acceptance is one thing the Jews incrementally work for to establish themselves and undermine their host rulers.
Therefore, the question now brought is, when did you become aware of your deemed contract, as per OFGEM's links available with a quick search for "OFGEM Deemed Contracts" will show. When did you voraciously go over the T's and C's of the agreement(s) you've been deemed to have made. When bearing in mind that by law contracts must be in exchange of equal value, what did you negotiate in? And how does the law support your rights of negotiating, or refusal for contract? Privacy Rights are where this body of law lies, and that is outside of Public Law, and in Private Law. Are you a law abiding citizen, then what law is it that you follow? Is it a forced law upon you, or do you feel you have had FULL conscionableness or conscionability? LINK.
"
conscionableness in British
or conscionability (ˌkɒnʃənəˈbɪlɪtɪ)
noun
law
the state of being conscionable
The doctrine of conscionability states that a party to a contract can be relieved of its obligations if the agreement is unconscionable, or contrary to good conscience.
Collins English Dictionary. Copyright © HarperCollins Publishers
According to their website they supply it when and where it's needed. They may change it, but I've grabbed a snap of it while it's up currently... Currently, haha... LINK. I'm going to accept their offer, just thought of that now, then we will have a bona fide contract. Cool!
This leaves, as far as I'm aware, the question of "Power", well, that's easy. And how it explains what 17 million White households and 10 million White businesses are scrimping to pay. Great Britain and Northern Ireland are White countries belonging to the Caucasoid Race. Our whole being is connected by biology as a racial branch family. I don't care who wants to argue to the contrary, it's a bona fide fact, and I deal in facts. Let Jews deal in their cock-a-maney dreams for sale, and let Caucasoid's protect their own interests so they may grow exponentially and reach the promised potentials as yet attacked by foreign enemies. A quick law lesson for you. All contracts are trusts, but not all trusts are contractual in nature.
So, if you can be discerning enough to follow and uphold the law, then there are chances that we an have a lawful society when people are fully conscious of what the law actually entails, and not led by insidious Jewish banking cartels and their corrupt Shabbos Goy Shetar network held together by the Rabbi's at the Synagogues and the Freemasonic Lodges, which they run. LINK.